Cycling infrastruture in São Paulo: Impacts of a leisure-oriented model
Tipo de publicação
Artigo
Curso ou área do conhecimento
Transporte
Veículo
12th ACIAHT2M
Tipo de autoria
Pessoa Física
Nome do autor
Letícia Lemos e Hélio Neto
Língua
Inglês
Abrangência geográfica
Municipal
País
Brasil
Estado
São Paulo
Município
São Paulo
Ano da publicação
Sem data
Palavra chave 1
infraestrutura cicloviária
Descrição
São Paulo is the wealthiest city in Latin America and has long lived under a car-oriented
policy, thus worsening other transport infrastructure and keeping people from shifting to more
sustainable modes of transportation. This has led the city to reach almost 300 km of daily
congestions, and the congestion to be rated as bad or terrible by 80% of the population (IBOPE,
2012). Despite that scenario, the Origin-Destiny survey, carried out by the subway company in
2007, shows that the share of daily trips with bicycles has nearly doubled in one decade (1997-
2007). This indicates that people are reaching out for new ways to commute, even when deprived
from infrastructure.
The local transit authority indicates that in 2012 São Paulo had approximately 200 km of
cycling infrastructure, which corresponds to less than 1.5% of the total extent of the city’s roads.
Even though, almost 30% are weekends-only, intended for leisure, done with the support of a
major traffic operation and funded by a financial institution. Additionally, although most of the
daily trips with bicycles are undertaken by lower income population, the scarce cycling
infrastructure is located mainly on wealthier neighbourhoods, increasing the social and spatial
segregation.
This paper is a critique of this unique leisure-oriented model of cycling infrastructure. To do
so, it provides an overview of the history of cycling in São Paulo, of how the model was created,
of its management and its characteristics, until the end of the later administration (2012). This
paper shows that this leisure-oriented model, among several consequences, has not only failed to
attend de mobility demands of the population, being used as a pretense solution for the lack of
cycling infrastructure. It also demonstrates some of its impacts on the mobility culture of São
Paulo and examples of its exportation throughout Brazil.